Inventing the book

I’ve been read­ing The Book in the Renais­sance by Andrew Pettegree while trav­el­ing. I'm pretty sure it was rec­om­mended to me by Tim Carmody. Even if not, it might as well have been. Read­ing Tim primes you per­fectly for this book.

It’s a his­tory of the early era of print­ing, and along the way, Pet­te­gree treats you to all these amaz­ing lit­tle sto­ries of busi­ness and inven­tion and life in the 15th and 16th centuries. Initially there’s not a lot of writ­ing, though. Basically none of the books printed and sold dur­ing that time were orig­i­nal com­po­si­tions; instead, it was all stuff writ­ten cen­turies ear­lier.

Slowly, that began to change. I just fin­ished the mini-​​chapter on Eras­mus, “the first liv­ing author to make a sub­stan­tial liv­ing from writ­ing,” and I’m enchanted. Eras­mus, you see, was a media inven­tor:

[He] was acutely aware of the role that the printer played in the suc­cess of a vol­ume. Through­out his career he gave close atten­tion to the pro­duc­tion process, seek­ing out the best print­ers and work­ing closely with them to ensure that the text was both ele­gant and accurate.

In fact,

When Eras­mus pre­pared his com­men­tary for the edi­tion of Jerome, he set out his man­u­script in exactly the same arrange­ment as it would appear on the printed page, with a large space left for a wood­cut ini­tial letter.

But really, every­body was a media inven­tor back then.

Pettegree’s his­tory over­flows with folks com­ing up with new for­mats, new mate­ri­als (new papers, new inks), new sup­ply chains (did you know books were trans­ported from city to city in specially-​​constructed book bar­rels?), new finan­cial arrange­ments (very often, print­ers would pay for paper with… books), new busi­ness mod­els (Renais­sance print­ers made a big chunk of their incomes, c.f. Tim again, selling cal­en­dars, almanacs, and the cash-​​cow Book of Hours)—and then all copy­ing each other like crazy.

The place to copy and be copied was the Frank­furt fair, which hap­pened twice a year; this was the pulse of the whole Euro­pean book busi­ness. Every spring and autumn, every­body came together to buy, sell, set­tle debts, and do a bit of trend-​​spotting. Print­ers syn­chro­nized new releases with the fair, because if you missed it, you had to wait another six months before you’d move any inven­tory. Maybe worse, your com­peti­tors would have the mar­ket all to them­selves in that time. Here’s Eras­mus again:

[N]othing gave Eras­mus greater plea­sure than his suc­cess in out­fox­ing Luther, when the reformer pub­lished his attack on Eras­mus in 1526. Eras­mus received a copy of Luther’s Bondage of the Will less than a fort­night before the spring fair. Luther must have antic­i­pated a free run for his work. But Eras­mus set to work, [his printer] Froben cleared his presses, and work­ing on six presses simul­ta­ne­ously had Erasmus’s reply ready in time.

Read­ing Pettegree’s book, I find myself think­ing: How thrilling. How fun. I wish I could have been part of that. But then I real­ize two things:

  1. It was a thrilling time for print­ers, but a hor­ri­ble time for writ­ers. Long-​​dead church fathers got a lot of play; liv­ing voices, not so much. The busi­ness of books wouldn’t wel­come new work until a cen­tury or more after its start.

  2. This is all hap­pen­ing again, right now. Now sure: history’s not a spi­ral, and our case is new. The inter­net is not the print­ing press and the Kin­dle Store is not the Frank­furt fair. But there’s some­thing in the feel­ing, if not the details, that is the same. The great oppor­tu­nity, the greater confusion, and, great­est of all, the lure of invention.

May 2011, Chios

You can explore my other blog posts.

The main thing to do here is sign up for my email newsletter, which is infrequent and wide-ranging. I always try to make it feel like a note from a friend: